Monday, July 13, 2009

The Importance of Being Diverse


As we move through our lives, we all begin to experience some worlds more than others. Whether we see more of the office than the outdoors, more of the streets than the school, more of the city than the jungle, or more of the computer than any thing else, each of us begins to see more of a few and less of the rest.

This past weekend I ventured past the computer, past the front door, past the streets and the buildings of New York, past the suburbs, past the small towns in Upstate New York, and into the Catskill Mountains. I went hiking on a very difficult trail called “Devils Path” by Tannersville, New York. We arrived at 12am and, with our headlamps, hiked to the first peak

It was at the top of the first peak, looking out at the lights from the small towns, the mountains visible by moonlight, and the few clouds that hung about the sky, that I noticed I was far from my world. My world currently consists of a large, shabby apartment in Brooklyn and a Federal Courthouse on Long Island. In between those two, I’ve found a half-world on the LIRR. But these, day in and day out, fill what I call my life, and for that I am grateful. But I understand the extent to which they are limiting. My situation could be much worse. I know many people who spend most of their waking life in front of a computer at a desk in an office. One can imagine the lack of real world stimulation, and cnn.com doesn’t count.

I propose that a limited routine, if not understood in the context of life, can become a health threat and long-term crisis. First, in keeping one’s world small, one misunderstands the relevance of his or her situation. For example, the people who enjoy Dunkin’ Donuts each morning forget that there are others, standing on the same Earth, who, by mere chance, were born into a situation where water is a privilege. They forget all the details that make our world possible. We begin to take life for granted. In doing so, forgetting the rest and focusing on the few, we box ourselves in mentally and physically. This often leads to depression and the fear that any given night we might just fall asleep and wake up thirty years later without really doing anything we wanted to. The illusion our small worlds paint for us seem to lie in wait, until we are old and a bit wiser, at which time they spring up and our mid-life crises set in.

There are some great counterarguments to this point. One argument is that those who are very focused are often the leaders in their fields, the ones who truly represent achievement. I would contend that those who truly enjoy their work actually maintain a much deeper understanding of life because they are more in tune with their dreams, that their mind’s hunger is never crippled, but rather satisfied and expanded with each new discovery, each project they finish. Another argument is that, to a certain extent (and this is certainly true for law students), we limit our routine because it will pay off one day. Concededly, this is the strongest challenge I face. If anyone has any rebuttals now would be the time to voice them. My reservation stems from my belief that this problem is rooted in the structure of American society, specifically, a lack in creative education, but let’s save this for another discussion.

Second, a limited routine cripples the mind’s unusual ability to dream. My assertion depends on the assumption that our minds cannot create something that is absolutely new, meaning, we cannot form an image if we have never seen an image before. Simply put, a limited routine stifles one’s dreams. I believe that all dreams are derivatives of experiences we have actually had. Therefore, if we limit our experiences, we limit our dreams.

To state it clearly, I propose that a limited routine is harmful, but only if one fails to understand the context of one’s life. So how does one understand the context? One option would be to ensure our life is speckled with thoughtful catalysts, such as the one I described above. Any input would be appreciated.

4 comments:

  1. Your points are well made. Two points I want to make. First, a routine is helpful to one's life as it adds stability and allows us to not waste time and energy on the menial. Conversely, a prolonged routine without break or outside experience becomes a crutch to one's life.

    Second, I am curious about this notion that a limited creative education leads to the work-obsessed American culture. I have a tendency to blame such attitudes on consumerism and the freedom to buy what we want, when we went, always. Defeating consumerism on its terms (as a means to broadening horizons) may be hopeless, but developing a counter-obsession to consumerism has helped many escape what you call a limited routine. Fulfilling creative desires as a life goal is one such counter-obsession.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm interested in your counter-obsession idea. I agree that the work-obsessed culture is caused by consumerism, but I think that we are such hungry consumers because the majority of us are taught from day one to buy things, that we need fancy shoes and expensive watches and a caramel frapaccino with whip cream. These constant lessons that barrage our senses seem to be an inevitable part of capitalism's incentive to sell more and more, faster and faster. I would ask that our education system is altered in such a way to prevent children from being so easily persuaded that happiness is just a new toy away. One of my next posts I'd like to address some of the harmful effects of consumerism on human values. In the meantime, this is a cool video for everyone to watch.

    http://www.storyofstuff.com/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Spot on Cod, a limited routine is a no-no. However, except for a few forays a year to other lands and experiences most of us are somewhat limited by our daily routines...that is if one doesn't have an imagination. Reading for me is a venue which frees the chains of limits. I know you'll say that this is living vicariously and not authentically, but I actually dream of the adventures I read about. I ache and rejoice with well written literature and my horizons constantly shift and expand in depth and complexity.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hmmm, interesting. I argue that the computer isn't a substitute for experience but you argue reading is a substitute. I would concede my argument is wrong if we were just floating minds and nothing more. However, we have a body attached to us and reading and sitting at the computer routinely does not jive with our nature as physical beings.

    ReplyDelete